<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 2039 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456075</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune held that in transfer pricing benchmarking using TNMM method, comparables engaged in both software services and product sales must be excluded when segmental details are unavailable. Two companies (Cybermate and Cybercom) were excluded as they provided services and sold products without separate segment data. The Tribunal ruled that companies cannot be excluded merely for losses in one year unless persistently loss-making, following Bombay HC precedent. Comparables must have same financial year as assessee. After excluding inappropriate comparables, assessee&#039;s margins fell within +/-5% range of remaining comparables. Appeal partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:48:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 2039 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456075</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune held that in transfer pricing benchmarking using TNMM method, comparables engaged in both software services and product sales must be excluded when segmental details are unavailable. Two companies (Cybermate and Cybercom) were excluded as they provided services and sold products without separate segment data. The Tribunal ruled that companies cannot be excluded merely for losses in one year unless persistently loss-making, following Bombay HC precedent. Comparables must have same financial year as assessee. After excluding inappropriate comparables, assessee&#039;s margins fell within +/-5% range of remaining comparables. Appeal partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>