<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1758 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456081</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, concluding no questions of law arose concerning the method of accounting adopted by the assessee, as upheld by the CIT(A) and ITAT. The issue of deduction applicability under Section 80(IB)(10) was remitted to the CIT(A) for factual determination, further supporting the dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:48:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1758 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456081</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, concluding no questions of law arose concerning the method of accounting adopted by the assessee, as upheld by the CIT(A) and ITAT. The issue of deduction applicability under Section 80(IB)(10) was remitted to the CIT(A) for factual determination, further supporting the dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>