<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (9) TMI 63 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37205</link>
    <description>For reopening a gift-tax assessment, section 16(1)(b) requires both a belief that taxable gift has escaped assessment and post-assessment information supporting that belief. The text states that &quot;information&quot; can include an external quasi-judicial determination, including an appellate order on the same property for the immediately preceding year. On that basis, the appellate order in the wealth-tax proceedings was treated as valid information, so reopening was upheld. Because the reassessment was founded on that fresh information and not on a mere change of opinion, the Tribunal&#039;s order quashing the reassessment was held to be incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:58:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (9) TMI 63 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37205</link>
      <description>For reopening a gift-tax assessment, section 16(1)(b) requires both a belief that taxable gift has escaped assessment and post-assessment information supporting that belief. The text states that &quot;information&quot; can include an external quasi-judicial determination, including an appellate order on the same property for the immediately preceding year. On that basis, the appellate order in the wealth-tax proceedings was treated as valid information, so reopening was upheld. Because the reassessment was founded on that fresh information and not on a mere change of opinion, the Tribunal&#039;s order quashing the reassessment was held to be incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>