<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 1003 - SC Order (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456071</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the Court declined to disturb the Tribunal&#039;s finding on limitation and undertook no independent reconsideration of that issue. As the appeal was viewed in light of the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion on limitation, the civil appeal was dismissed. The operative point is that the limitation finding remained undisturbed and determined the outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:44:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 1003 - SC Order (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456071</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the Court declined to disturb the Tribunal&#039;s finding on limitation and undertook no independent reconsideration of that issue. As the appeal was viewed in light of the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion on limitation, the civil appeal was dismissed. The operative point is that the limitation finding remained undisturbed and determined the outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>