<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1091 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754484</link>
    <description>HC allowed the petitioner&#039;s challenge to appellate orders, finding the 20-day delay in filing appeal was minimal. The court set aside the previous order, remanded the matter to appellate authority, and directed the petitioner to re-present the appeal within 10 days. The appellate authority was instructed to adjudicate the appeal on merits without considering limitation period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 13:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1091 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754484</link>
      <description>HC allowed the petitioner&#039;s challenge to appellate orders, finding the 20-day delay in filing appeal was minimal. The court set aside the previous order, remanded the matter to appellate authority, and directed the petitioner to re-present the appeal within 10 days. The appellate authority was instructed to adjudicate the appeal on merits without considering limitation period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>