https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754483 GST liability intimated on seigniorage fee and mining lease amounts was treated as part of the same category as earlier Division Bench directions in similar disputes. The Court followed that approach and allowed the petitioner time to file a reply to the intimation, while consequential proceedings were to remain deferred pending the larger Bench decision on the nature of royalty. The writ petition was thus disposed of on the same terms, with liberty to the petitioner to submit a reply within four weeks. en-us Fri, 07 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jun 2024 15:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754483 GST liability intimated on seigniorage fee and mining lease amounts was treated as part of the same category as earlier Division Bench directions in similar disputes. The Court followed that approach and allowed the petitioner time to file a reply to the intimation, while consequential proceedings were to remain deferred pending the larger Bench decision on the nature of royalty. The writ petition was thus disposed of on the same terms, with liberty to the petitioner to submit a reply within four weeks. Case-Laws GST Fri, 07 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754483