<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1086 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754479</link>
    <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner challenging GST tax demand, finding breach of natural justice principles. Court set aside the original order, directing respondent to provide fair hearing and issue fresh assessment. Petitioner must remit 10% of disputed tax demand and submit reply within two weeks. Respondent mandated to conduct personal hearing and issue new order within three months, preserving petitioner&#039;s legal contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 13:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1086 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754479</link>
      <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner challenging GST tax demand, finding breach of natural justice principles. Court set aside the original order, directing respondent to provide fair hearing and issue fresh assessment. Petitioner must remit 10% of disputed tax demand and submit reply within two weeks. Respondent mandated to conduct personal hearing and issue new order within three months, preserving petitioner&#039;s legal contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>