<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1081 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754474</link>
    <description>HC reviewed a tax order dated 10.10.2023 challenging tax discrepancies. The court found the order lacked substantive reasoning and contained inconsistent tax demands compared to the initial show cause notice. Consequently, HC set aside the order, allowing respondent to initiate fresh proceedings in compliance with legal requirements, without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1081 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754474</link>
      <description>HC reviewed a tax order dated 10.10.2023 challenging tax discrepancies. The court found the order lacked substantive reasoning and contained inconsistent tax demands compared to the initial show cause notice. Consequently, HC set aside the order, allowing respondent to initiate fresh proceedings in compliance with legal requirements, without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>