<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1079 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754472</link>
    <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner challenging a provisional attachment order under Section 83 of Central GST Act, 2017. The court found the attachment order had expired after one year and directed AU Small Finance Bank to release the bank account restrictions. The judgment emphasized statutory compliance and protection of individual financial rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1079 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754472</link>
      <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner challenging a provisional attachment order under Section 83 of Central GST Act, 2017. The court found the attachment order had expired after one year and directed AU Small Finance Bank to release the bank account restrictions. The judgment emphasized statutory compliance and protection of individual financial rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>