<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1073 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754466</link>
    <description>HC quashed penalty orders under Section 129(3) of UP GST Act following search of business premises. Relying on precedent, the court found no justification for penalty proceedings. Directed respondents to refund tax and penalty amounts deposited by petitioner within four weeks, effectively allowing the writ petition and providing relief to the taxpayer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1073 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754466</link>
      <description>HC quashed penalty orders under Section 129(3) of UP GST Act following search of business premises. Relying on precedent, the court found no justification for penalty proceedings. Directed respondents to refund tax and penalty amounts deposited by petitioner within four weeks, effectively allowing the writ petition and providing relief to the taxpayer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>