<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1063 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754456</link>
    <description>The MP HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against ITAT&#039;s order allowing telescopic benefit to the assessee. The assessee had surrendered unaccounted income during survey proceedings and later deposited cash in bank accounts. The revenue added this as unexplained cash credit under Section 68. ITAT deleted the addition, holding that surrendered income could explain subsequent bank deposits as the cash originated from maturity proceeds of hundis seized during survey. HC upheld ITAT&#039;s factual findings, noting proper analysis of evidence including names of hundi borrowers and maturity dates. The court found no substantial question of law arose, as ITAT being final fact-finding authority had comprehensively examined all circumstances and documents without any perverse findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:37:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1063 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754456</link>
      <description>The MP HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against ITAT&#039;s order allowing telescopic benefit to the assessee. The assessee had surrendered unaccounted income during survey proceedings and later deposited cash in bank accounts. The revenue added this as unexplained cash credit under Section 68. ITAT deleted the addition, holding that surrendered income could explain subsequent bank deposits as the cash originated from maturity proceeds of hundis seized during survey. HC upheld ITAT&#039;s factual findings, noting proper analysis of evidence including names of hundi borrowers and maturity dates. The court found no substantial question of law arose, as ITAT being final fact-finding authority had comprehensively examined all circumstances and documents without any perverse findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>