<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Trust donations for capital asset not taxable income per ITAT. Donations treated as subsidy = capital receipts.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78801</link>
    <description>The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, assessed whether donations received by a trust for acquiring a capital asset should be taxed as income. The trust treated the donations as corpus funds, not income, in its books. The ITAT agreed with the trust&#039;s argument that the donations were to be considered capital receipts, not income u/s 56(1). The ITAT noted that the trust, as a business entity, lawfully treated the donations as subsidies following donor-specific directions. Therefore, Section 2(24)(iia) and Section 56(1) were not applicable, and the addition on donations was directed to be deleted, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:37:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:37:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Trust donations for capital asset not taxable income per ITAT. Donations treated as subsidy = capital receipts.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78801</link>
      <description>The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, assessed whether donations received by a trust for acquiring a capital asset should be taxed as income. The trust treated the donations as corpus funds, not income, in its books. The ITAT agreed with the trust&#039;s argument that the donations were to be considered capital receipts, not income u/s 56(1). The ITAT noted that the trust, as a business entity, lawfully treated the donations as subsidies following donor-specific directions. Therefore, Section 2(24)(iia) and Section 56(1) were not applicable, and the addition on donations was directed to be deleted, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:37:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>