https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754435 The Bombay HC set aside an order passed under Section 206(4) of the Companies Act 2013 requiring a company to furnish details and documents. The court held that such orders must establish a prima facie case showing how the requested information relates to fraudulent or unlawful business conduct. The impugned order lacked this essential linkage and contained no findings of fraudulent activity. The respondent's own affidavit clarified no fraud was alleged, making compliance with mandatory preconditions under Section 206(1)-(3) necessary. The court ruled the order was issued without jurisdiction and could not be sustained. en-us Thu, 20 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:36:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754435 The Bombay HC set aside an order passed under Section 206(4) of the Companies Act 2013 requiring a company to furnish details and documents. The court held that such orders must establish a prima facie case showing how the requested information relates to fraudulent or unlawful business conduct. The impugned order lacked this essential linkage and contained no findings of fraudulent activity. The respondent's own affidavit clarified no fraud was alleged, making compliance with mandatory preconditions under Section 206(1)-(3) necessary. The court ruled the order was issued without jurisdiction and could not be sustained. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 20 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754435