<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>TDS u/s 34 of U.P. Vat act</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119176</link>
    <description>The core operative position is that TDS on a works-contract payment is limited to the prescribed deduction by the employer and may not be duplicated by the JV on back-to-back payments to a constituent partner; payments internal to a registered JV fall outside the contractor-to-third-party scenario in the notification dated 4 March 2008, and a penalty under Section 34(8) is challengeable where tax has already been deducted by the contractee and there is no revenue loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:20:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:11:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>TDS u/s 34 of U.P. Vat act</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119176</link>
      <description>The core operative position is that TDS on a works-contract payment is limited to the prescribed deduction by the employer and may not be duplicated by the JV on back-to-back payments to a constituent partner; payments internal to a registered JV fall outside the contractor-to-third-party scenario in the notification dated 4 March 2008, and a penalty under Section 34(8) is challengeable where tax has already been deducted by the contractee and there is no revenue loss.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:20:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>