<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1603 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456053</link>
    <description>For tariff classification, white chocolate must conform to the HSN Explanatory Notes, including proof of cocoa butter content. The Tribunal found that the Department failed to establish by test report or other indisputable evidence that the goods contained cocoa butter, so they could not be treated as white chocolate. On that basis, the products were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 12/2012-CE, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 20:51:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1603 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456053</link>
      <description>For tariff classification, white chocolate must conform to the HSN Explanatory Notes, including proof of cocoa butter content. The Tribunal found that the Department failed to establish by test report or other indisputable evidence that the goods contained cocoa butter, so they could not be treated as white chocolate. On that basis, the products were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 12/2012-CE, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>