https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456064 Interference with an acquittal is justified only when the trial court's view is perverse, based on no evidence, or reflects an unreasonable appreciation of the record; where two reasonable views are possible, the one favouring the accused prevails. Applying that standard, the court found no perversity in the acquittal. The prosecution also failed to dislodge the trial court's view because the eyewitnesses, including the injured witness, turned hostile, and the alleged recovery lacked reliable evidentiary linkage to the occurrence. Leave to appeal was therefore declined and the acquittal left undisturbed. en-us Thu, 06 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jun 2024 20:51:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456064 Interference with an acquittal is justified only when the trial court's view is perverse, based on no evidence, or reflects an unreasonable appreciation of the record; where two reasonable views are possible, the one favouring the accused prevails. Applying that standard, the court found no perversity in the acquittal. The prosecution also failed to dislodge the trial court's view because the eyewitnesses, including the injured witness, turned hostile, and the alleged recovery lacked reliable evidentiary linkage to the occurrence. Leave to appeal was therefore declined and the acquittal left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456064