https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456065 In an appeal against acquittal, interference is permissible only when the trial court's view is not a possible view and the evidence leads to no conclusion other than guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The High Court reversed acquittal without discussing the eyewitness evidence, without recording findings on the individual or collective role of the accused, and without explaining the applicability of Section 149 IPC. The trial court, by contrast, had carefully assessed the evidence, including delay in lodging the FIR and an unexplained injury to one accused, and its view remained a possible view on the record. The reversal of acquittal was therefore unsustainable, and the acquittal was restored. en-us Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Apr 2025 16:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456065 In an appeal against acquittal, interference is permissible only when the trial court's view is not a possible view and the evidence leads to no conclusion other than guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The High Court reversed acquittal without discussing the eyewitness evidence, without recording findings on the individual or collective role of the accused, and without explaining the applicability of Section 149 IPC. The trial court, by contrast, had carefully assessed the evidence, including delay in lodging the FIR and an unexplained injury to one accused, and its view remained a possible view on the record. The reversal of acquittal was therefore unsustainable, and the acquittal was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456065