https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456046 An order drawn up on signed minutes tendered by counsel to record a concluded position is not, by itself, a consent order barring review. A true consent order arises only where the court expressly passes its order on consent terms, and counsel's signatures on minutes serve identification and binding effect rather than an express consensual adjudication. The Supreme Court held that treating the earlier order as a consent order was incorrect, so the High Court's refusal to entertain the review petition could not stand. The order rejecting review was set aside and the review petition was restored for fresh hearing on merits. en-us Wed, 23 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:36:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456046 An order drawn up on signed minutes tendered by counsel to record a concluded position is not, by itself, a consent order barring review. A true consent order arises only where the court expressly passes its order on consent terms, and counsel's signatures on minutes serve identification and binding effect rather than an express consensual adjudication. The Supreme Court held that treating the earlier order as a consent order was incorrect, so the High Court's refusal to entertain the review petition could not stand. The order rejecting review was set aside and the review petition was restored for fresh hearing on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456046