<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant on misinterpretation of Customs Act. Tug &amp; bunkers correctly classified. Appeal allowed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78768</link>
    <description>The case involves an appeal against a final assessment order concerning the classification and duty assessment of a tug and its bunkers under relevant Customs Acts. The Appellate Tribunal held that the tug, brought for breaking at a port, was correctly classified under a specific tariff heading. The bunkers were part of the tug&#039;s goods for breaking, and duty cannot be separately demanded. Referring to a precedent, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, stating that the facts were similar to the cited case, thus allowing the appeal. The impugned order was deemed unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:29:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:29:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant on misinterpretation of Customs Act. Tug &amp; bunkers correctly classified. Appeal allowed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78768</link>
      <description>The case involves an appeal against a final assessment order concerning the classification and duty assessment of a tug and its bunkers under relevant Customs Acts. The Appellate Tribunal held that the tug, brought for breaking at a port, was correctly classified under a specific tariff heading. The bunkers were part of the tug&#039;s goods for breaking, and duty cannot be separately demanded. Referring to a precedent, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, stating that the facts were similar to the cited case, thus allowing the appeal. The impugned order was deemed unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:29:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>