<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (3) TMI 30 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37188</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that they could not be assessed as a &quot;body of individuals.&quot; The court found that the two brothers did not constitute an &quot;association of persons&quot; or a &quot;body of individuals&quot; based on the lack of common purpose or action to produce income. The assessment by the Income-tax Officer was overturned for the assessment years in question, and the assessee was entitled to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:51:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (3) TMI 30 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37188</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that they could not be assessed as a &quot;body of individuals.&quot; The court found that the two brothers did not constitute an &quot;association of persons&quot; or a &quot;body of individuals&quot; based on the lack of common purpose or action to produce income. The assessment by the Income-tax Officer was overturned for the assessment years in question, and the assessee was entitled to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>