<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1026 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754419</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the AO lacked jurisdiction under section 153C due to the absence of incriminating material related to the specific assessment year. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for seized documents to pertain to the relevant year and for transactions to be unrecorded in the books of account. The decision underscores the importance of compliance with Tribunal directions and the requirement of incriminating evidence for valid additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 08:12:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1026 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754419</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the AO lacked jurisdiction under section 153C due to the absence of incriminating material related to the specific assessment year. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for seized documents to pertain to the relevant year and for transactions to be unrecorded in the books of account. The decision underscores the importance of compliance with Tribunal directions and the requirement of incriminating evidence for valid additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>