<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1021 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754414</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai quashed Pr.CIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263 regarding depreciation on goodwill and inventory amortization disallowance. The tribunal held that depreciation on goodwill arising from amalgamation was permissible per SC precedent in Smifs Securities Ltd, making the assessment order neither erroneous nor prejudicial to revenue. Regarding inventory amortization, despite assessee&#039;s admission of inadvertent error requesting higher disallowance, the tribunal found no revenue prejudice as assessee had substantial business losses that would have lapsed. The twin conditions of Section 263 - order being both erroneous and prejudicial to revenue - were not satisfied. Appeal decided in favor of assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2024 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1021 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754414</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai quashed Pr.CIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263 regarding depreciation on goodwill and inventory amortization disallowance. The tribunal held that depreciation on goodwill arising from amalgamation was permissible per SC precedent in Smifs Securities Ltd, making the assessment order neither erroneous nor prejudicial to revenue. Regarding inventory amortization, despite assessee&#039;s admission of inadvertent error requesting higher disallowance, the tribunal found no revenue prejudice as assessee had substantial business losses that would have lapsed. The twin conditions of Section 263 - order being both erroneous and prejudicial to revenue - were not satisfied. Appeal decided in favor of assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>