<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (9) TMI 24 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37184</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the decisions of the Appellate Tribunal and the AAC. It held that the acquisition of the saw mill did not constitute a splitting up of an existing business, as the new venture was unrelated to the prior business activities. Therefore, the assessee was entitled to claim exemption under section 84 (now section 80J) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court awarded costs and a hearing fee to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:45:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (9) TMI 24 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37184</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the decisions of the Appellate Tribunal and the AAC. It held that the acquisition of the saw mill did not constitute a splitting up of an existing business, as the new venture was unrelated to the prior business activities. Therefore, the assessee was entitled to claim exemption under section 84 (now section 80J) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court awarded costs and a hearing fee to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>