<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 998 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754391</link>
    <description>Assessment and appellate interference cannot rest on suspicion or unverified inference. Under Section 29(7) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, a best judgment assessment required notice, hearing and proper inquiry; the assessee&#039;s explanation about the sauda register was not independently tested, no verification was made from the named dealers, and the alleged concealment was not established, so the tax, interest and penalty could not be sustained. The Tax Board also failed to deal with the Appellate Authority&#039;s reasons and relied on a new reading of &quot;WB&quot; as &quot;without bills&quot; without supporting material, so its order was unsustainable and was set aside, with the Appellate Authority&#039;s order restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 08:10:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 998 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754391</link>
      <description>Assessment and appellate interference cannot rest on suspicion or unverified inference. Under Section 29(7) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, a best judgment assessment required notice, hearing and proper inquiry; the assessee&#039;s explanation about the sauda register was not independently tested, no verification was made from the named dealers, and the alleged concealment was not established, so the tax, interest and penalty could not be sustained. The Tax Board also failed to deal with the Appellate Authority&#039;s reasons and relied on a new reading of &quot;WB&quot; as &quot;without bills&quot; without supporting material, so its order was unsustainable and was set aside, with the Appellate Authority&#039;s order restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>