<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Accused acquitted in cheque dishonour case as signature not denied. Trial judge&#039;s decision upheld, appellate judge&#039;s ruling set aside.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78753</link>
    <description>The High Court dealt with a case involving the dishonour of a cheque. The accused did not deny her signature on the cheque, triggering the presumption u/ss 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court convicted the accused u/s 138. The complainant&#039;s financial capacity was questioned, but the appellate court did not properly analyze this aspect. Consequently, the High Court set aside the appellate court&#039;s decision, reinstated the trial court&#039;s judgment, and confirmed the conviction and sentence against the accused. The appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 08:10:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 08:10:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Accused acquitted in cheque dishonour case as signature not denied. Trial judge&#039;s decision upheld, appellate judge&#039;s ruling set aside.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78753</link>
      <description>The High Court dealt with a case involving the dishonour of a cheque. The accused did not deny her signature on the cheque, triggering the presumption u/ss 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court convicted the accused u/s 138. The complainant&#039;s financial capacity was questioned, but the appellate court did not properly analyze this aspect. Consequently, the High Court set aside the appellate court&#039;s decision, reinstated the trial court&#039;s judgment, and confirmed the conviction and sentence against the accused. The appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 08:10:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>