https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37177 The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned orders, and directed the respondent to proceed according to law. It held that the writ petition was maintainable despite the non-exhaustion of statutory remedies, emphasized the distinction between dissolution and reconstitution of the partnership firm, and ruled that the assessment and demand notices were invalid due to non-service on the petitioner. The court highlighted the legal significance of proper notice and the necessity for adherence to procedural requirements under the Income Tax Act. en-us Thu, 24 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:19:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37177 The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned orders, and directed the respondent to proceed according to law. It held that the writ petition was maintainable despite the non-exhaustion of statutory remedies, emphasized the distinction between dissolution and reconstitution of the partnership firm, and ruled that the assessment and demand notices were invalid due to non-service on the petitioner. The court highlighted the legal significance of proper notice and the necessity for adherence to procedural requirements under the Income Tax Act. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 24 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37177