<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 966 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754359</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the enhanced valuation of imported goods, ruling that the Customs authorities improperly rejected the declared transaction values without valid justification, contrary to section 14 and Valuation Rules. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the reassessment of the bills of entry at the Appellant&#039;s declared values.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 16:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 966 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754359</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the enhanced valuation of imported goods, ruling that the Customs authorities improperly rejected the declared transaction values without valid justification, contrary to section 14 and Valuation Rules. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the reassessment of the bills of entry at the Appellant&#039;s declared values.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>