<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 960 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754353</link>
    <description>An application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 requires strict documentary proof of operational debt and default. Here, the operational creditor failed to produce authenticated invoices, ledger accounts, financial statements, or other reliable records to establish the debt, default, or any admitted liability linked to part-payment, so admission was not justified. The claim was also held to be time-barred because the invoices related to an earlier period, no acknowledgment within limitation was shown, and the alleged partial payment was insufficient on the facts proved. Corporate insolvency resolution process initiation was therefore declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2024 08:35:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 960 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754353</link>
      <description>An application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 requires strict documentary proof of operational debt and default. Here, the operational creditor failed to produce authenticated invoices, ledger accounts, financial statements, or other reliable records to establish the debt, default, or any admitted liability linked to part-payment, so admission was not justified. The claim was also held to be time-barred because the invoices related to an earlier period, no acknowledgment within limitation was shown, and the alleged partial payment was insufficient on the facts proved. Corporate insolvency resolution process initiation was therefore declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>