https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456033 The order records a challenge to a notice on the basis that the petitioner may not have received the statutory 15-day period to file objections, with the actual date of issue and service left for verification. It also notes the contention that audit proceedings could not continue after cancellation of registration, and a further objection that the audit was not completed within the statutory period. These objections were not finally decided and were kept open pending instructions, with the matter directed to be listed again. en-us Thu, 16 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456033 The order records a challenge to a notice on the basis that the petitioner may not have received the statutory 15-day period to file objections, with the actual date of issue and service left for verification. It also notes the contention that audit proceedings could not continue after cancellation of registration, and a further objection that the audit was not completed within the statutory period. These objections were not finally decided and were kept open pending instructions, with the matter directed to be listed again. Case-Laws GST Thu, 16 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456033