<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1485 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456020</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune upheld addition under section 68 for bogus long-term capital gains, denying exemption under section 10(38). The tribunal found the assessee obtained accommodation entries through penny stock transactions with no economic basis for price rise. Following precedent in Ravi Bhaskar Wattamwar and Delhi HC decision in Suman Poddar, the tribunal held the gains were rightfully assessed as undisclosed income rather than genuine capital gains. The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2024 07:16:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1485 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456020</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune upheld addition under section 68 for bogus long-term capital gains, denying exemption under section 10(38). The tribunal found the assessee obtained accommodation entries through penny stock transactions with no economic basis for price rise. Following precedent in Ravi Bhaskar Wattamwar and Delhi HC decision in Suman Poddar, the tribunal held the gains were rightfully assessed as undisclosed income rather than genuine capital gains. The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>