<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1338 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456026</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi held that section 69A addition for unexplained money based on bank account credit entries was unsustainable. The non-resident assessee was not obliged to maintain books of account in India, with only interest income from bank accounts and tax refunds. Even treating bank statements as books of account, section 69A was inapplicable as transactions were properly recorded. The assessee adequately explained each credit entry&#039;s source in NRO/NRE accounts. Commissioner (Appeals) improperly rejected additional evidence on flimsy grounds. Cash deposits were acceptably explained as originating from earlier withdrawals given their proximity. Appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1338 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456026</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi held that section 69A addition for unexplained money based on bank account credit entries was unsustainable. The non-resident assessee was not obliged to maintain books of account in India, with only interest income from bank accounts and tax refunds. Even treating bank statements as books of account, section 69A was inapplicable as transactions were properly recorded. The assessee adequately explained each credit entry&#039;s source in NRO/NRE accounts. Commissioner (Appeals) improperly rejected additional evidence on flimsy grounds. Cash deposits were acceptably explained as originating from earlier withdrawals given their proximity. Appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>