<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1247 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456029</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appeal challenging a validation act regarding refund of amounts paid under protest. The Court reaffirmed the doctrine of unjust enrichment, holding that a person who passes on the tax burden to others, directly or indirectly, cannot claim refund of tax later declared illegal or unconstitutional. The Court noted that manufacturers typically include both raw material costs and tax components in final product pricing, passing the burden to consumers. The principle applies regardless of specific statutory provisions, and the Court found no grounds to interfere with the lower court&#039;s judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2024 07:16:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1247 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456029</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appeal challenging a validation act regarding refund of amounts paid under protest. The Court reaffirmed the doctrine of unjust enrichment, holding that a person who passes on the tax burden to others, directly or indirectly, cannot claim refund of tax later declared illegal or unconstitutional. The Court noted that manufacturers typically include both raw material costs and tax components in final product pricing, passing the burden to consumers. The principle applies regardless of specific statutory provisions, and the Court found no grounds to interfere with the lower court&#039;s judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>