<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Unsecured loans at 9% rate disallowed in tax assessment; Respondent explained transactions, no substantial legal question raised.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78708</link>
    <description>The High Court considered the treatment of unsecured loans disallowed in tax assessment at 9% p.a. The ITAT, u/s CIT-Appeals, held that the Respondent explained the transactions satisfactorily. Referring to another ITAT decision, it found the addition to income was based on conjecture. The HC concluded that no substantial legal question was raised for appeal as the evidence supported the Respondent&#039;s position. This case did not involve accounting entries disguising transactions, and factual aspects were resolved in favor of the Respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 18:57:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 18:57:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Unsecured loans at 9% rate disallowed in tax assessment; Respondent explained transactions, no substantial legal question raised.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78708</link>
      <description>The High Court considered the treatment of unsecured loans disallowed in tax assessment at 9% p.a. The ITAT, u/s CIT-Appeals, held that the Respondent explained the transactions satisfactorily. Referring to another ITAT decision, it found the addition to income was based on conjecture. The HC concluded that no substantial legal question was raised for appeal as the evidence supported the Respondent&#039;s position. This case did not involve accounting entries disguising transactions, and factual aspects were resolved in favor of the Respondent.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 18:57:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>