<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Payments to USA parent company not taxable in India as not FTS under u/s 195. AE didn&#039;t &quot;make available&quot; tech knowledge.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78704</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal addressed the taxability of payments as Fee for Technical Services (FTS) u/s 195. The Assessing Officer (AO) found the services provided by the Associate Enterprise (AE) to be FTS, upheld by CIT(A). The assessee argued that the AE did not &quot;make available&quot; knowledge, as required u/s 9 of the Act and Article 12(4)(b) of the DTAA. Referring to relevant cases, the Tribunal held that for FTS taxability, services must not only be technical but also &quot;make available&quot; knowledge. As the AO failed to prove the AE provided technical knowledge, the appeal was allowed, rejecting the AO&#039;s reliance on overruled cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 18:50:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 18:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Payments to USA parent company not taxable in India as not FTS under u/s 195. AE didn&#039;t &quot;make available&quot; tech knowledge.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78704</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal addressed the taxability of payments as Fee for Technical Services (FTS) u/s 195. The Assessing Officer (AO) found the services provided by the Associate Enterprise (AE) to be FTS, upheld by CIT(A). The assessee argued that the AE did not &quot;make available&quot; knowledge, as required u/s 9 of the Act and Article 12(4)(b) of the DTAA. Referring to relevant cases, the Tribunal held that for FTS taxability, services must not only be technical but also &quot;make available&quot; knowledge. As the AO failed to prove the AE provided technical knowledge, the appeal was allowed, rejecting the AO&#039;s reliance on overruled cases.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 18:50:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>