<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Affirms Statutory Interest Under Companies (Court) Rules, 1959; Upholds Workmen&#039;s Rights in Liquidation Appeals.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78687</link>
    <description>The High Court considered the grant of statutory interest u/s 156 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 and the scope of u/s 483 of the Companies Act, 1956. It held that u/s 483 provides the right to appeal in winding-up matters. The purpose of u/s 529-A is to protect workmen&#039;s claims in liquidation, ensuring their rights pari passu with secured creditors. The definition of &quot;vested right&quot; requires substantiation by competent authority. The case involved workmen&#039;s non-claim for interest, with payments prioritized from unsecured asset sale proceeds. The appellate court&#039;s power u/s 483 aims for complete justice. The Court upheld the Single Judge&#039;s decision on statutory interest, dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 18:15:39 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 18:15:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Affirms Statutory Interest Under Companies (Court) Rules, 1959; Upholds Workmen&#039;s Rights in Liquidation Appeals.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78687</link>
      <description>The High Court considered the grant of statutory interest u/s 156 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 and the scope of u/s 483 of the Companies Act, 1956. It held that u/s 483 provides the right to appeal in winding-up matters. The purpose of u/s 529-A is to protect workmen&#039;s claims in liquidation, ensuring their rights pari passu with secured creditors. The definition of &quot;vested right&quot; requires substantiation by competent authority. The case involved workmen&#039;s non-claim for interest, with payments prioritized from unsecured asset sale proceeds. The appellate court&#039;s power u/s 483 aims for complete justice. The Court upheld the Single Judge&#039;s decision on statutory interest, dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 18:15:39 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>