<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 951 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754344</link>
    <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner challenging tax assessment, finding lack of proper notice and violation of natural justice principles. The court set aside the original tax orders, remanded the matter for reconsideration, and directed respondent to provide petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand, subject to remitting 10% of disputed tax. Fresh orders to be issued within three months after hearing the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 951 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754344</link>
      <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner challenging tax assessment, finding lack of proper notice and violation of natural justice principles. The court set aside the original tax orders, remanded the matter for reconsideration, and directed respondent to provide petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand, subject to remitting 10% of disputed tax. Fresh orders to be issued within three months after hearing the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>