<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 940 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754333</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad held that penalty under section 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with notice under section 142(1) was not justified. The assessee&#039;s accountant suffered from Covid-19 illness, preventing timely response to statutory notices. A new accountant was subsequently engaged who collected information and submitted reply to the show cause notice, resulting in regular assessment order under section 143(3). The tribunal found reasonable cause for initial non-compliance and noted that eventual compliance occurred before assessment completion. The penalty was deleted as the delay was bonafide, not deliberate, particularly considering the transition from physical to digital assessment proceedings during the pandemic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 08:18:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 940 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754333</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad held that penalty under section 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with notice under section 142(1) was not justified. The assessee&#039;s accountant suffered from Covid-19 illness, preventing timely response to statutory notices. A new accountant was subsequently engaged who collected information and submitted reply to the show cause notice, resulting in regular assessment order under section 143(3). The tribunal found reasonable cause for initial non-compliance and noted that eventual compliance occurred before assessment completion. The penalty was deleted as the delay was bonafide, not deliberate, particularly considering the transition from physical to digital assessment proceedings during the pandemic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>