<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 923 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754316</link>
    <description>ITAT Kolkata allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes regarding capital gains computation under section 50C. The assessee sold property for Rs. 35 lakh, claiming it represented fair market value, while Stamp Valuation Authority valued it at Rs. 45 lakh. The tribunal held that lower authorities should have referred the matter to Departmental Valuation Officer for proper valuation instead of applying deeming provisions. Matter restored to AO for reference to valuation officer and decision in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 08:16:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 923 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754316</link>
      <description>ITAT Kolkata allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes regarding capital gains computation under section 50C. The assessee sold property for Rs. 35 lakh, claiming it represented fair market value, while Stamp Valuation Authority valued it at Rs. 45 lakh. The tribunal held that lower authorities should have referred the matter to Departmental Valuation Officer for proper valuation instead of applying deeming provisions. Matter restored to AO for reference to valuation officer and decision in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>