<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (6) TMI 9 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37161</link>
    <description>Tax paid under section 68 of the Finance Act, 1965, on disclosed concealed income was treated as a deductible debt owed for wealth-tax purposes. The court reasoned that a statutory income-tax liability, once incurred and later quantified, is a present liability and ordinarily ranks as a debt owed under section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. Although section 68 operated through a special voluntary disclosure mechanism rather than the ordinary charging provisions, the payment was regarded as tax paid in lieu of income-tax and attracted the same wealth-tax treatment. The question was therefore answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:40:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (6) TMI 9 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37161</link>
      <description>Tax paid under section 68 of the Finance Act, 1965, on disclosed concealed income was treated as a deductible debt owed for wealth-tax purposes. The court reasoned that a statutory income-tax liability, once incurred and later quantified, is a present liability and ordinarily ranks as a debt owed under section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. Although section 68 operated through a special voluntary disclosure mechanism rather than the ordinary charging provisions, the payment was regarded as tax paid in lieu of income-tax and attracted the same wealth-tax treatment. The question was therefore answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>