<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Undisclosed sales issue: Tribunal rejects Revenue&#039;s request for higher profit rate, stresses need for reasonable basis.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78664</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal addressed undisclosed sales and net profit determination. The CIT(A) limited the addition to the net profit element, with the Revenue arguing for a 12.5% rate instead of 8%. Incriminating material was found during a search at the director&#039;s residence, indicating off-the-books sales. The Tribunal ruled that a higher net profit rate must be justified based on business nature and facts, not arbitrarily. The Revenue failed to provide a reasonable basis for the 12.5% rate, and the High Court decision cited did not align with the assessee&#039;s activities. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:12:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:12:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Undisclosed sales issue: Tribunal rejects Revenue&#039;s request for higher profit rate, stresses need for reasonable basis.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78664</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal addressed undisclosed sales and net profit determination. The CIT(A) limited the addition to the net profit element, with the Revenue arguing for a 12.5% rate instead of 8%. Incriminating material was found during a search at the director&#039;s residence, indicating off-the-books sales. The Tribunal ruled that a higher net profit rate must be justified based on business nature and facts, not arbitrarily. The Revenue failed to provide a reasonable basis for the 12.5% rate, and the High Court decision cited did not align with the assessee&#039;s activities. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:12:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>