https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456008 After vesting of an estate under the Bihar Land Reforms Act, the former proprietor has no authority to create fresh rights in the vested property, and later acts of revenue collection do not create estoppel against the State. The former proprietor cannot be treated as an implied agent, constructive trustee, or ostensible owner where the State gave no consent or representation supporting the settlement. A transaction entered into on that basis is void from inception, but money paid under such a void arrangement may be recoverable in restitution under Section 65 where the defect relates to the property transferred; a claim for interest requires a separate contractual, customary, or legal basis. en-us Wed, 01 Nov 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:18:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456008 After vesting of an estate under the Bihar Land Reforms Act, the former proprietor has no authority to create fresh rights in the vested property, and later acts of revenue collection do not create estoppel against the State. The former proprietor cannot be treated as an implied agent, constructive trustee, or ostensible owner where the State gave no consent or representation supporting the settlement. A transaction entered into on that basis is void from inception, but money paid under such a void arrangement may be recoverable in restitution under Section 65 where the defect relates to the property transferred; a claim for interest requires a separate contractual, customary, or legal basis. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Nov 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456008