<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 894 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754287</link>
    <description>The HC partially allowed the writ petition challenging the rejection of a tax appeal. Despite acknowledging the proprietor&#039;s medical issues, the court found gaps in explaining the entire delay period. The HC directed the appellate authority to hear the appeal on merits upon payment of costs to the State Revenue Authorities, setting aside the original dismissal order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 13:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 894 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754287</link>
      <description>The HC partially allowed the writ petition challenging the rejection of a tax appeal. Despite acknowledging the proprietor&#039;s medical issues, the court found gaps in explaining the entire delay period. The HC directed the appellate authority to hear the appeal on merits upon payment of costs to the State Revenue Authorities, setting aside the original dismissal order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>