https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754280 The HC addressed a dispute involving an IGST refund claim under the Advance Authorization Scheme. The court restrained respondents from taking coercive actions against the petitioner and scheduled the matter for hearing. The court found merit in examining the challenge to Rule 96 sub-Rule 10 of CGST Rules, 2017, and directed further proceedings on 22.07.2024. en-us Mon, 13 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 May 2025 12:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754280 The HC addressed a dispute involving an IGST refund claim under the Advance Authorization Scheme. The court restrained respondents from taking coercive actions against the petitioner and scheduled the matter for hearing. The court found merit in examining the challenge to Rule 96 sub-Rule 10 of CGST Rules, 2017, and directed further proceedings on 22.07.2024. Case-Laws GST Mon, 13 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754280