<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 868 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754261</link>
    <description>ITAT Chennai ruled on multiple tax issues for a dredging company. The tribunal held that bare-boat charter hire payments to Belgium companies are not subject to TDS under section 195, as such payments fall outside the scope of royalty under the India-Belgium DTAA, following precedent from Madras HC. For transfer pricing, the tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s CUP method for benchmarking charter hire payments to associated enterprises, rejecting the TPO&#039;s entity-level TNMM approach and deleting the Rs. 23.46 crore adjustment, citing consistency with Mumbai ITAT decision. However, the tribunal upheld the TPO&#039;s adjustment regarding technical services payment calculation based on project turnover. The AO was directed to verify and allow TDS credits as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 08:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 868 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754261</link>
      <description>ITAT Chennai ruled on multiple tax issues for a dredging company. The tribunal held that bare-boat charter hire payments to Belgium companies are not subject to TDS under section 195, as such payments fall outside the scope of royalty under the India-Belgium DTAA, following precedent from Madras HC. For transfer pricing, the tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s CUP method for benchmarking charter hire payments to associated enterprises, rejecting the TPO&#039;s entity-level TNMM approach and deleting the Rs. 23.46 crore adjustment, citing consistency with Mumbai ITAT decision. However, the tribunal upheld the TPO&#039;s adjustment regarding technical services payment calculation based on project turnover. The AO was directed to verify and allow TDS credits as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>