<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 859 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754252</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition of Rs. 14,09,000/- as unexplained money under section 69A, deposited during the demonetization period. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for the assessee to be given an opportunity to explain the receipts. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further verification, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 08:36:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 859 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754252</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition of Rs. 14,09,000/- as unexplained money under section 69A, deposited during the demonetization period. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for the assessee to be given an opportunity to explain the receipts. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further verification, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>