<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1337 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314565</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on commission income estimation where assessee failed to maintain books of accounts or provide details of parties making deposits totaling Rs. 158 crores. Despite claiming commission income at 0.1-0.15% of deposits, assessee provided no supporting documentation or beneficiary details. CIT(A) had added commission income at 1% of total receipts. ITAT held that without proper records or evidence, commission income should be restricted to 0.25% of total bank deposits, partially allowing assessee&#039;s appeal. Separate cash deposit addition of Rs. 3,21,730 was deleted as it formed part of declared income, avoiding double taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 06:55:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1337 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314565</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on commission income estimation where assessee failed to maintain books of accounts or provide details of parties making deposits totaling Rs. 158 crores. Despite claiming commission income at 0.1-0.15% of deposits, assessee provided no supporting documentation or beneficiary details. CIT(A) had added commission income at 1% of total receipts. ITAT held that without proper records or evidence, commission income should be restricted to 0.25% of total bank deposits, partially allowing assessee&#039;s appeal. Separate cash deposit addition of Rs. 3,21,730 was deleted as it formed part of declared income, avoiding double taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>