<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 837 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754230</link>
    <description>Adverse classification of borrower accounts under RBI fraud and wilful defaulter frameworks requires disclosure of the material relied on, effective notice, and a meaningful hearing before final action is taken. Fraud declarations were invalid because the record did not show service of notice or opportunity to respond before the accounts were classified as fraud. Wilful defaulter orders were also invalid because the show-cause notices failed to disclose the facts and reasons forming the bank&#039;s prima facie case, and later reliance on additional grounds breached natural justice. The impugned declarations and orders were quashed, while fresh action was left open if the prescribed procedure is followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 22:22:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 837 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754230</link>
      <description>Adverse classification of borrower accounts under RBI fraud and wilful defaulter frameworks requires disclosure of the material relied on, effective notice, and a meaningful hearing before final action is taken. Fraud declarations were invalid because the record did not show service of notice or opportunity to respond before the accounts were classified as fraud. Wilful defaulter orders were also invalid because the show-cause notices failed to disclose the facts and reasons forming the bank&#039;s prima facie case, and later reliance on additional grounds breached natural justice. The impugned declarations and orders were quashed, while fresh action was left open if the prescribed procedure is followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>