<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Quashes Tax Reassessment Notice Due to Lack of Credible Evidence Linking Information to Belief.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78644</link>
    <description>The High Court addressed the issue of reopening assessment u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act. The case involved the alleged absence of a &quot;reason to believe&quot; and a &quot;live link&quot; between information and belief. The assessment was reopened based on information uploaded by the ADIT (Inv) on the Income Tax Department&#039;s portal, designated as &quot;High Risk Transaction&quot; for 2016-17. The petitioner had declared the loss in the return for 2017-18, which was accepted by the AO. The Court emphasized that reopening required a valid reason to believe income had escaped assessment, not merely a change of opinion. The Court found the existing Section 147 requirements were not met, as no credible information supported the reopening. The notice u/s 148 and the subsequent order were quashed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:30:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:30:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Quashes Tax Reassessment Notice Due to Lack of Credible Evidence Linking Information to Belief.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78644</link>
      <description>The High Court addressed the issue of reopening assessment u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act. The case involved the alleged absence of a &quot;reason to believe&quot; and a &quot;live link&quot; between information and belief. The assessment was reopened based on information uploaded by the ADIT (Inv) on the Income Tax Department&#039;s portal, designated as &quot;High Risk Transaction&quot; for 2016-17. The petitioner had declared the loss in the return for 2017-18, which was accepted by the AO. The Court emphasized that reopening required a valid reason to believe income had escaped assessment, not merely a change of opinion. The Court found the existing Section 147 requirements were not met, as no credible information supported the reopening. The notice u/s 148 and the subsequent order were quashed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:30:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>