https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78642 The High Court addressed the validity of an assessment u/s 153A and the jurisdiction for assessment proceedings transfer. The petitioner challenged the transfer from Sangli to Kozhikode, citing lack of mandatory notice and hearing u/s 127(2) and absence of a Document Identification Number (DIN) in the order. The Court found that notice was duly served, giving the petitioner an opportunity to respond, which was not utilized. The absence of DIN is being considered by the Supreme Court, but the transfer was deemed valid as the petitioner's business and recovery were within Kozhikode's jurisdiction. The Court dismissed the writ petition, finding no errors in the proceedings. en-us Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:07:37 +0530 Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:07:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78642 The High Court addressed the validity of an assessment u/s 153A and the jurisdiction for assessment proceedings transfer. The petitioner challenged the transfer from Sangli to Kozhikode, citing lack of mandatory notice and hearing u/s 127(2) and absence of a Document Identification Number (DIN) in the order. The Court found that notice was duly served, giving the petitioner an opportunity to respond, which was not utilized. The absence of DIN is being considered by the Supreme Court, but the transfer was deemed valid as the petitioner's business and recovery were within Kozhikode's jurisdiction. The Court dismissed the writ petition, finding no errors in the proceedings. Highlights Income Tax Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:07:37 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78642