<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1344 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314540</link>
    <description>While granting anticipatory bail, the Court held that the object of bail is to secure the accused&#039;s presence and cooperation, not to impose oppressive conditions that defeat liberty. It accepted that human sureties are not mandatory in every case and that a personal bond may be supported by alternative financial security, including cash deposit, fixed deposit, bank guarantee or blocked funds, where offered and appropriate. The Court required that such conditions remain reasonable, workable and proportionate, and it preserved safeguards for attendance, non-interference with witnesses and compliance with investigation requirements. The petitioners were thus entitled to anticipatory bail on conditions designed to secure appearance and cooperation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 08:34:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1344 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314540</link>
      <description>While granting anticipatory bail, the Court held that the object of bail is to secure the accused&#039;s presence and cooperation, not to impose oppressive conditions that defeat liberty. It accepted that human sureties are not mandatory in every case and that a personal bond may be supported by alternative financial security, including cash deposit, fixed deposit, bank guarantee or blocked funds, where offered and appropriate. The Court required that such conditions remain reasonable, workable and proportionate, and it preserved safeguards for attendance, non-interference with witnesses and compliance with investigation requirements. The petitioners were thus entitled to anticipatory bail on conditions designed to secure appearance and cooperation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>